<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone, Apple, Cisco, Law Suit, Web 2.0 and what not!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsaurus.com/online-office/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/online-office/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/</link>
	<description>The Dino which deals in all kind of technical related stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Odetta</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/online-office/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/comment-page-1/#comment-154219</link>
		<dc:creator>Odetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/2007/01/11/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/#comment-154219</guid>
		<description>Well written article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rootprotect</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/online-office/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Rootprotect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/2007/01/11/iphone-apple-cisco-law-suit-web-20-and-what-not/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Well that is something which happens most often in this Professional world. I think giving a consent to use the brand name is a good throught on Cisco&#039;s part but atleast Apple should have formally taken a request which would have ascertained them because use a brand name is not a small thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that is something which happens most often in this Professional world. I think giving a consent to use the brand name is a good throught on Cisco&#8217;s part but atleast Apple should have formally taken a request which would have ascertained them because use a brand name is not a small thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
