<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Application for screecasting in Mac OS X!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>The Dino which deals in all kind of technical related stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamaria</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-324902</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/#comment-324902</guid>
		<description>No offense intended.  I can see what you are saying and I completely agree.  However, this response is a bit out of context.  In fact, there is lots of free screencasting software.  The surprising part is not that people charge for OSX screencasting software.  It is that the average price is a great deal higher than that of equivalent Windows software.  Windows users can get their screencasting software for free.  OSX users cannot.  Within THAT context, I was shocked and even outraged myself.  Does that make more sense from a properly capitalistic perspective? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense intended.  I can see what you are saying and I completely agree.  However, this response is a bit out of context.  In fact, there is lots of free screencasting software.  The surprising part is not that people charge for OSX screencasting software.  It is that the average price is a great deal higher than that of equivalent Windows software.  Windows users can get their screencasting software for free.  OSX users cannot.  Within THAT context, I was shocked and even outraged myself.  Does that make more sense from a properly capitalistic perspective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le pou</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-302479</link>
		<dc:creator>Le pou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 07:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/#comment-302479</guid>
		<description>Hi,  
have you tried QT Player &gt; File &gt; New screen recording ? 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
have you tried QT Player &gt; File &gt; New screen recording ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-297231</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/#comment-297231</guid>
		<description>And now there is Camtasia for Mac available, which is very very nice&#8230;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now there is Camtasia for Mac available, which is very very nice&hellip;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugman</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-288847</link>
		<dc:creator>bugman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/#comment-288847</guid>
		<description>Jing is not an opensource software! It&#039;s proprietary commercial. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jing is not an opensource software! It&#039;s proprietary commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hints for a Successful Phun Project : Aragon Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-138848</link>
		<dc:creator>Hints for a Successful Phun Project : Aragon Physics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/#comment-138848</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/6-application-for-screecasting-in-mac-os-x/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

