<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ScreenRip32 &#8211; Light weight screen capturing tool!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/</link>
	<description>The Dino which deals in all kind of technical related stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binny V A</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-30349</link>
		<dc:creator>Binny V A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/#comment-30349</guid>
		<description>I used to have this software back when I was on windows. Its a great software - easy to use and fast. But there is one important drawback - its a dead software - it has not been updated for years.

Still, I will recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have this software back when I was on windows. Its a great software &#8211; easy to use and fast. But there is one important drawback &#8211; its a dead software &#8211; it has not been updated for years.</p>
<p>Still, I will recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReviewSaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-30177</link>
		<dc:creator>ReviewSaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/#comment-30177</guid>
		<description>Hey Indyank

We evaluate the programs based on the ease of use and features. They are the things which count mostly in the rating.

If the UI is better then it gets better rankings...but features and ease of use is the biggest factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Indyank</p>
<p>We evaluate the programs based on the ease of use and features. They are the things which count mostly in the rating.</p>
<p>If the UI is better then it gets better rankings&#8230;but features and ease of use is the biggest factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indyank</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-29831</link>
		<dc:creator>indyank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsaurus.com/software-reviews/screenrip32-light-weight-screen-capturing-tool/#comment-29831</guid>
		<description>lemme try this...

Mayankk, what are the various criteria that you evaluate the software for, while giving them dinos and what weightage you assign to each criteria?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lemme try this&#8230;</p>
<p>Mayankk, what are the various criteria that you evaluate the software for, while giving them dinos and what weightage you assign to each criteria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

